+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Summer Fluke Troubles

  1. #1
    Super Moderator PADavid is on a distinguished road PADavid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Bucks, Co. PA
    Posts
    543
    Rep Power
    60

    Default Summer Fluke Troubles

    Here is a letter I got from the RFA. You can cut, paste and alter as you like, but please send one!!

    Patricia A. Kurkul
    National Marine Fisheries Service
    One Blackburn Drive
    Gloucester, MA 01930

    RE: Comments of 2008 Summer Flounder, Scup and Black Sea Bass Specifications

    Dear Ms. Kurkul:

    As a recreational angler and resident of Pennsylvania, I submit the following comments on the proposed summer flounder, scup and black sea bass quotas for 2008. At their last meeting, the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council approved a 15.77 million pound for summer flounder. While this hardly represents a quota reflective of the true status of the summer flounder resource, I must reluctantly support this proposed quota for summer flounder as being the highest allowable quota under the current federal requirements. I have considerable concerns with the management of summer flounder and the information used to estimate effort, catch, harvest and stock status. In addition, I am very concerned about increasing minimum size limits which require fishermen to harvest heavier fish and which also increases discard mortality.

    As proposed, it is very likely that recreational anglers from my state will drastically decrease their participation in these fisheries in response the limited opportunity that will be afforded in all neighboring states under the proposed quotas. Being a recreational saltwater angler in a non-coastal state, it takes considerable more effort to engage in fishing. Furthermore, I have a higher mean expense per trip than anglers that live closer to the ocean. Obviously, the simple enjoyment of going fishing is a considerable return for my effort and expense. However, for fisheries such as summer flounder, which have a higher consumptive value than some other important recreational fisheries, it is necessary to have regulations that allow an acceptable probability of catching fish that can be harvested. That said, the proposed specifications and any subsequent quota reductions stand to have a significant impact on Pennsylvania anglers.

    I request National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) conduct a thorough economic analysis assuming a 15.77 million pound quota is approved in 2008. Furthermore, the socio-economic impacts must be estimated for the various coast wide options proposed to restrict recreational harvest in 2008. As it stands, 2008 poses to have a significant impact on Pennsylvania anglers.

    Respectfully submitted,
    ______________________________ ______________________________
    Signature Print Name
    ______________________________
    Print Address
    ______________________________ Print Address

  2. #2
    RnRCircus
    Guest

    Default

    Thanks David. I will be sending one.

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts